top of page

READING LIST

WEEK #01 :

 

- Hatch, M. (2014).The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. New York: McGraw Hill. 

Maker Movement Manifesto. 11-33.

Knowledge, Learning, Control and Intelligence. 69-91. 

 

- Gershenfeld, N. (2005).FAB the Coming Revolution on Your Desktop: From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. New York: Basic Books.

The Past. 

Building Models

Playing at Work.

 

- Söderberg, J. (2011). Free Software to Open Hardware: Critical Theory on The Frontiers of Hacking.

Who is the hacker?. 22-28. 

 

- Martinez, S., Stager, G. (2013). Invent to Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom.

An Insanely Brief and Incomplete History of Making. 11-27.  

 

- Lang, D. (2013). Zero to Maker. Sebastopol, CA: Maker Media.

Access to Tools. 71-89.

Craftsmanship. 91-108. 

 

- Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Publishing.

The New Industrial Revolution. 17-32. 

The History of the Future. 33-52.  

 

- Resnick, M., Rosenbaum, E. (2013). in Design Make Play: Growing the Next Generation of Stem Innovators (eds. Honey, M., Kanter, D.). New York: Routledge.

Designing for Tinkerability. 163-181.

 

 

 

WEEK #12 :

 

- Voyatzaki, M. (2015). ArchiDoct, vol:2(2).  

 Hacking Architectural Materiality Towards a More Agile Architecture. 10-20.

 

- Gourdoukis, D. (2015). ArchiDoct, vol:2(2).  

 Digital Craftsmanship: From the Arts and Crafts to Digital Fabrication. 43-56.

 

- Aagard, A. K. (2015). ArchiDoct, vol:2(2).  

 Material and Virtuality. 57-71.

 

- Sheil, B. (2005). arq, vol:9(1).  

Transgression from Drawing to Making20-32.

 

- Sheil, B. (2005). Architectural Design, vol:75(10).

Introduction: Design Through Making. 5-12

 

- Burry, M. (2005). Architectural Design, vol: 75(10). 

Homo Faber. 30-38.

 

- Burry, M. (2012). in Persisting Modelling: Extending the Role of Architectural Representation.

The Persistance of Faith in the Intangible Model. 26-40. 

 

- Hill, J. (2005). Architectural Design, vol: 75(10). 

Building the Drawing. 13-22.

 

- Glanville, R. (2012). in Persisting Modelling: Extending the Role of Architectural Representation. 

Intention and the User. 41-50.

 

- Oxman, N. (2012). in Manufacturing the Bespoke.

Material Computation. 256-265

 

- Payne, J. (2012). in Matter: Material Processes in Architectural Production

Raspberry Fields. 47-61.

 

- Perez-Gomez, A. (2012). in Persisting Modelling: Extending the Role of Architectural Representation

The Historical Context of Contemporary Architectural Representation. 13-25.

 

- Perez-Gomez, A. (2007). in From Models to Drawings.

Questions of Representation. 11-22.

 

- Pye, D. (1978). in The Nature and Aesthetics of Design

Techniques. Skill. 43-57.

Invention: Analogous Results. 58-66.

 

- West, M. (2008). Architectural Design, vol: 78(4).

Thinking with Matter. 50-56.

 

- West, M. (2012). in Manufacturing the Bespoke.

The Fore Cast. 132-145.

 

- Thomsen, M. (2008). Architectural Design, vol: 78(4).

Robotic Membranes: Exploring a Textile Architecture of Behaviour. 92-98.

 

- Thomsen, M., Karmon, A. (2009). in Digital Arts and Culture.

Computational Materials: Embedding Computation into the Everyday.

 

-  How Sustainable is Digital Fabrication? (2014). in Low-Tech Magazine. 

bottom of page